Search

MTBS3D Check out this interview with Tony Zheng, Co-Founder of @matatalab. They have developed a new robotic toy for child… https://t.co/PPnrmshvQ5
MTBS3D Adshir makes ray tracing technology that works on countless platforms and device types. They’re are the first on r… https://t.co/yqLobXhx14
MTBS3D We interviewed Steve Venuti, VP of Marketing for @KeyssaTech. They've developed a solid state connector that is cha… https://t.co/081Ie1799L
MTBS3D Jim Malcolm, Chief Marketing Officer for @HumanEyesTech demonstrated their latest combination 360 degree plus 180… https://t.co/dfnwLmc1Os
MTBS3D .@Dlink spoke to us last week at #CES2020 about their latest Wifi 6 mesh router and what it means for end users.… https://t.co/n2HXCcufMX
MTBS3D RT @tifcagroup: Our Client-to-Cloud Revolution Portal is LIVE! Computing is heading towards a world of any place, any device user experienc…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: .@thekhronosgroup President @neilt3d talks open standards and client-to-cloud at #IFCSummit. #CloudComputing https://t.co/T
MTBS3D Please help @tifcagroup by completing their survey by December 16th! https://t.co/nInslvJ1HM
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: #IFCSummit Visionaries Panel with @IntelSoftware @intel @AMD and @jonpeddie talks Client-to-Cloud. #CloudComputing #FutureCo
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: The Futurists Panel moderated by @deantak of @VentureBeat is online. #IFCSummit #CloudComputing #FutureComputing #Futurists
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Daryl Sartain is Director & Worldwide Head of #XR, Displays, and Wireless Ecosystems for @Radeon at @AMD. He is also Chair o…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Arvind Kumar is a Senior Principal Engineer for @intel @IntelSoftware. At #IFCSummit he explained the workings of the Client…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Neil Schneider’s #IFCSummit opening presentation. #CloudComputing https://t.co/CFqiNxSzPV
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Our #videogames in the #clienttocloud revolution is going on now featuring @playhatchglobal @AccelByteInc @awscloud and @Sha

Ready Player One is Just a Movie, People!


It's a precarious position to tie the market's riches with the success of a Spielberg movie.  That seems to be the case with Ready Player One where an upcoming Stephen Spielberg epic about a double VR life in an otherwise dismal world is hoped to somehow spur on the vision of virtual reality and immersive technology to the general public.

We've seen this kind of thing before with the Avatar movie, though this has more of a disconnected twist.  In the case of Avatar, its sheer financial success was a proof of concept for 3D entertainment and it carried some real weight that held up to scrutiny.  If anyone questioned the future of 3D, all they had to do was say "yeah, but look at the oodles of money that Avatar made".  Ironically, $2.8 billion dollars later (accounting for inflation), Cameron expressed that he thought the 3D was too modest in Avatar and didn't go far enough during the 3D Entertainment Summit several years ago.

The VR equivalent of Ready Player One isn't even about making money in the box office to prove the value of a technology.  In this case, it's hoped that people are going to see this fantasy vision and everyone is going to say "I want that" only to be slapped with the reality of where VR and immersive technology is today.    I would argue that it's the same as showing Star Wars in hopes of selling the NASA Space Program.  VR has a great reality, but come on!

I think the people who will ultimately benefit from Ready Player One are those working in the field because it delivers a vision; something to look forward to given enough time, money, and huge technological advances.  For the general public; it will be a fun movie.

Ready Player One has a Rotten Tomato rating of 76% so it's probably going to be a descent film.  Let's enjoy it for what it is and avoid creating a false dependence on such things.