Search

MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Daryl Sartain is Director & Worldwide Head of #XR, Displays, and Wireless Ecosystems for @Radeon at @AMD. He is also Chair o…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Arvind Kumar is a Senior Principal Engineer for @intel @IntelSoftware. At #IFCSummit he explained the workings of the Client…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Neil Schneider’s #IFCSummit opening presentation. #CloudComputing https://t.co/CFqiNxSzPV
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Our #videogames in the #clienttocloud revolution is going on now featuring @playhatchglobal @AccelByteInc @awscloud and @Sha
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: On stage now, the #Crypto and #Blockchain markets with Professor Bebo White @bebo and Melissa Brown, Senior Director Develop…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Finishing off our busy morning is Mark Morrison, Director of Sales for @magicleap. He was talking about Building ROI in the…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Dominique Pouliquen CEO of @CintooCloud did a live demo of their #clienttocloud technology. #IFCSummit #CloudComputing #VR h…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Next up is Stefan Holzer CTO of @fyusioninc on Democratizing #3D Content for #ecommerce. #IFCSummit #FutureComputing https:/…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Enabling an Immersive World panel moderated by Kevin Krewel of @tiriasresearch with Alex Hornstein CTO of @LKGGlass Rama Kri…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Vinay Narayan VP at @htcvive starts off the morning for us here at #IFCSummit. He is speaking on how #5G is powering the nex…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: We finished the first day of #IFCSummit with a great Futurists Panel moderated by @deantak of @VentureBeat with @awscloud @D
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Some highlights of our busy morning here at #IFCSummit. With @IntelSoftware @AMDPC @AMDGaming @jonpeddie #futurecomputing #C
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Hours left in our #Halloween  flash sale! Take over 600.00 off the price of a ticket today only! 👻🎃🧛🏼‍♂️🧟‍♀️#IFCSummit #Clou
MTBS3D RT @thekhronosgroup: Today only! Get access to the @IFCSummit for only $349. Happy Halloween! https://t.co/eg2jOce4eQ
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: #Halloween flash sale! Take over 600.00 off the price of a ticket today only! 👻🎃🧛🏼‍♂️🧟‍♀️#IFCSummit #CloudComputing #CloudGa
MTBS3D RT @TheFoundryTeam: Mathieu Mazerolle, our Cloud Product Manager will be speaking at The @IFCSummit running November 5-6, 2019 at the Compu…

Stereoscopic 3D Benchmarking: DDD, iZ3D, Nvidia

Crysis Warhead

While Crytek has been promoting Crysis 2 as supporting 3D without a drop in frames per second, it’s going to be a pseudo 2D+depth solution that doesn’t render a second camera view.

Crysis Warhead combined with DDD, iZ3D, and Nvidia stereoscopic 3D drivers does it the old fashioned way - complete left/right rendering.  This makes Warhead a great performance measuring tool.  We ran an external benchmarking utility because it let us go through a fixed testing series in batch form.

The only setting we turned off was shadows because it causes major problems on all three driver solutions.

Crysis Warhead, 1280X720, FPS Crysis Warhead, 1920X1080, FPS

At 1280X720, the GTX285 didn’t really have any clear performance winners.  iZ3D had a one or two frame advantage here and there, but that was all.  The 6870 had a similar result, though DDD held the lead this time around.

On the GTX285, while DDD and iZ3D had a minor performance advantage over Nvidia’s drivers at lower resolutions, this edge diminished at 1920X1080 as the antialiasing settings increased.

DDD seemed to have some trouble with antialiasing compared to iZ3D on Crysis Warhead with the 6870.  The moment antialiasing was activated, its performance dropped like a rock with each settings increase.

Crysis Warhead, 1280X720, Efficiency Crysis Warhead, 1920X1080, Efficiency

Nvidia’s GeForce 3D Vision drivers have average but consistent stereoscopic 3D efficiency with Crysis Warhead.  While they are easily outperformed in 1280X720 on the GTX285, their efficiency is unmatched at 1920X1080.  In contrast, DDD and iZ3D do well at the beginning of the race, but putter out at high resolution on the GTX285.

What is interesting is that while DDD and iZ3D performed better on the 6870, their efficiency grades both dropped at 2X AA.  They faced a modest drop of efficiency at 4X AA, and become nearly useless at 8X AA.