Search

MTBS3D RT @BelayIP: First meeting of #CES19 in the books. Online interview with Neil Schneider of #mtbs3d. Come say hi to me and @BasemarkLtd if y…
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: .@AffordStudio Co-Founder Avery Rueb talked about the status of #technology in the classroom and new innovations that will…
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: Dereck Orr of National Institute of Standards and Technology @usnistgov gave the first keynote at #Immersed2018. He talked…
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: At #Immersed2018, Charlie Choo of @studio216 talked about how they are using #immersivetechnologies like #AR, #VR, and #MR
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: #ArtificialIntelligence is an important part of what's next in #futurecomputing and was a vital topic at #Immersed2018. B…
MTBS3D What better way to exemplify future computing than to talk about prototyping using #VirtualReality and… https://t.co/zeNEOR7Uhw
MTBS3D MTBS-TV: Rama Krishna Aravind is the Founder and Creative Director of Poco Loco Amusements. He shared his inspirati… https://t.co/AR2VAvcZBP
MTBS3D MTBS-TV: Dr. David Rolston @dwrolston speaks about the future of #AI & #VR at @GetImmersed. #Immersed2018 https://t.co/5V9A18c6Vk
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: Kevin Williams, Chairman of the @DNA_Conference is easily one of the market's go-to-guys for all things dealing with out o…
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: Bob Raikes is the Founder of Meko Ltd. who publish the leading industry journal @Display_Daily. @brmeko spoke about displ…
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: Easily one of the highlights at #Immersed2018, Mike Domaguing, @Survios' VP of Marketing, gave a rundown of the #VR projec…
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: .@elumenati makes immersive projection solutions that multiple people can enjoy at the same time. At #Immersed2018, Hilary…
MTBS3D Daryl Sartain talked #immersive #AI & #Blockchain at @GetImmersed. Sartain is the Director and Worldwide Head of… https://t.co/LmqWZjQn0w
MTBS3D RT @GetImmersed: #Immersed2018 starts on Thursday! Tickets still available: https://t.co/5CJiYUiNKF #Immersed18 #business #healthcare #AI #…

U-Decide 2010 Preliminary Results, Part 2

By Neil Schneider

Yesterday, we presented a few charts from the preliminary findings from 2010's edition of The U-Decide Initiative.  As a reminder, here are some of its key features:
  • Data collected from July 7th to October 1st, 2010
  • Jointly partnered and promoted with Panasonic, Electronic Arts, Ubisoft, Steelseries, Zalman, Blitz Games Studios, Computer Power User, and Meant to be Seen.
  • Purposely targeted to gamers (console & PC)
  • 1,169 respondents (735 traditional 2D gamers that don't own 3D equipment, 434 experienced stereoscopic 3D gamers that do)
  • These preliminary results are 100% based on the 2D gamer portion to avoid skewing.
  • This is a tiny sampling of the data collected.  A full report will be released in November, 2010.
  • 75% of respondents are based in North America, 15% are from Europe, and the remaining 10% span the world.
  • According to the Entertainment Software Association, over 50% of adults play video games.
The work continues!

Is There Money to be Made For Game Developers?

One of the leading issues for stereoscopic 3D game developers is whether or not there is money to be made from having a special 3D mode, and whether or not gamers would be willing to spend a premium on this mode.

3D Premium for 3D PC Games (2D Gamer Sample)

According to traditional 2D gamers, there is a clear willingness to spend a bit more for 3D compatibility (if they owned a 3D display).  Approximately 40% of respondents are willing to spend anywhere from $3 to $5 more on a $50 game title on PC.  Another 12% is ok with playing as much as $10 more.  Over 15% suggest premiums as high as 50% to 100% more for their video games.  We are unconvinced that premiums this high would sell very well with gamers, but it's a good indicator that 3D compatibility has measurable value associated with it.

3D Premium for 3D Console Games (2D Gamer Sample)

Willingness to pay a premium for 3D compatibility is a bit less for console gamers versus PC gamers, but not by much.  Just under 40% are comfortable with the $3 to $5 range, and almost 12% will go as high as $10.  As with PC, we aren't big believers in the $25 to $50 premium range for console 3D games, but almost 14% of 2D gamers suggest this as a possibility.

Up until now, 3D gaming has been treated as a free feature on PC and console video games.  Do you think this trend will change?  Why or why not?  Do you see this as a feasible way for game developers to make some extra money out of stereoscopic 3D gaming?  What criteria would game developers need to meet for a premium like this to be feasible?