Search

MTBS3D .@ULdialogue is getting ready to launch a new stream of benchmarking products for the creative space. Check out ou… https://t.co/5GNmtKyosu
MTBS3D Check out our interview with Chris Leigh, Regional Sales Director @powervisionme. He talks about their latest water… https://t.co/g6H06Co8Mq
MTBS3D Check out our interview with Zsolt Szigetlaki, Founder of the YAW Motion Simulator, a motion simulator chair for… https://t.co/iEcxJidqaB
MTBS3D Check out this interview with Tony Zheng, Co-Founder of @matatalab. They have developed a new robotic toy for child… https://t.co/PPnrmshvQ5
MTBS3D Adshir makes ray tracing technology that works on countless platforms and device types. They’re are the first on r… https://t.co/yqLobXhx14
MTBS3D We interviewed Steve Venuti, VP of Marketing for @KeyssaTech. They've developed a solid state connector that is cha… https://t.co/081Ie1799L
MTBS3D Jim Malcolm, Chief Marketing Officer for @HumanEyesTech demonstrated their latest combination 360 degree plus 180… https://t.co/dfnwLmc1Os
MTBS3D .@Dlink spoke to us last week at #CES2020 about their latest Wifi 6 mesh router and what it means for end users.… https://t.co/n2HXCcufMX
MTBS3D RT @tifcagroup: Our Client-to-Cloud Revolution Portal is LIVE! Computing is heading towards a world of any place, any device user experienc…
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: .@thekhronosgroup President @neilt3d talks open standards and client-to-cloud at #IFCSummit. #CloudComputing https://t.co/T
MTBS3D Please help @tifcagroup by completing their survey by December 16th! https://t.co/nInslvJ1HM
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: #IFCSummit Visionaries Panel with @IntelSoftware @intel @AMD and @jonpeddie talks Client-to-Cloud. #CloudComputing #FutureCo
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: The Futurists Panel moderated by @deantak of @VentureBeat is online. #IFCSummit #CloudComputing #FutureComputing #Futurists
MTBS3D RT @IFCSummit: Daryl Sartain is Director & Worldwide Head of #XR, Displays, and Wireless Ecosystems for @Radeon at @AMD. He is also Chair o…

U-Decide 2010 Preliminary Results, Part 2

By Neil Schneider

Yesterday, we presented a few charts from the preliminary findings from 2010's edition of The U-Decide Initiative.  As a reminder, here are some of its key features:
  • Data collected from July 7th to October 1st, 2010
  • Jointly partnered and promoted with Panasonic, Electronic Arts, Ubisoft, Steelseries, Zalman, Blitz Games Studios, Computer Power User, and Meant to be Seen.
  • Purposely targeted to gamers (console & PC)
  • 1,169 respondents (735 traditional 2D gamers that don't own 3D equipment, 434 experienced stereoscopic 3D gamers that do)
  • These preliminary results are 100% based on the 2D gamer portion to avoid skewing.
  • This is a tiny sampling of the data collected.  A full report will be released in November, 2010.
  • 75% of respondents are based in North America, 15% are from Europe, and the remaining 10% span the world.
  • According to the Entertainment Software Association, over 50% of adults play video games.
The work continues!

Is There Money to be Made For Game Developers?

One of the leading issues for stereoscopic 3D game developers is whether or not there is money to be made from having a special 3D mode, and whether or not gamers would be willing to spend a premium on this mode.

3D Premium for 3D PC Games (2D Gamer Sample)

According to traditional 2D gamers, there is a clear willingness to spend a bit more for 3D compatibility (if they owned a 3D display).  Approximately 40% of respondents are willing to spend anywhere from $3 to $5 more on a $50 game title on PC.  Another 12% is ok with playing as much as $10 more.  Over 15% suggest premiums as high as 50% to 100% more for their video games.  We are unconvinced that premiums this high would sell very well with gamers, but it's a good indicator that 3D compatibility has measurable value associated with it.

3D Premium for 3D Console Games (2D Gamer Sample)

Willingness to pay a premium for 3D compatibility is a bit less for console gamers versus PC gamers, but not by much.  Just under 40% are comfortable with the $3 to $5 range, and almost 12% will go as high as $10.  As with PC, we aren't big believers in the $25 to $50 premium range for console 3D games, but almost 14% of 2D gamers suggest this as a possibility.

Up until now, 3D gaming has been treated as a free feature on PC and console video games.  Do you think this trend will change?  Why or why not?  Do you see this as a feasible way for game developers to make some extra money out of stereoscopic 3D gaming?  What criteria would game developers need to meet for a premium like this to be feasible?