The Number One Resource For Stereoscopic 3D Excitement!
https://www.mtbs3d.com/phpbb/
I will begrudgingly admit that Samsung's ultra-lightweight 3D glasses don't look as bad as generic active shutter specs, but that's not saying much. Noses and ears, breathe a sigh of relief: they weigh just 28 grams. [Samsung Tomorrow
via OLED-Display]
http://gizmodo.com/5723219/lightest-3d- ... Gizmodo%29" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Not going to interest me if it's going to augment the price of the glasses...cybereality wrote:Now they just need some engineers to make curved LCDs.
I think that curved lenses may be more trouble then they are worth. The problem is th alignment of the crystals in the LCD and keeping a consistent thickness of the liquid layer would be problematic. I think that we're likely to see curved lenses for the polarized 3D TVs before we see it for active shutter ones - that's if they make them at all.Fredz wrote:Not going to interest me if it's going to augment the price of the glasses...cybereality wrote:Now they just need some engineers to make curved LCDs.
I thought so. It shouldn't be that much different to the polarized sunglasses you get. I would think there would be some technical issues to the active LCD having a curve though since they rely on very precise thickness of the liquid crystal layer.cybereality wrote:Well they already make polarized glasses with slight curve to them, I have a couple. They look just like any regular sun-glasses. And they are way lighter than any active-shutters are, so I am not sure how Samsung can make a claim like that.
