Avatar 3D trailer (real S-3D - NOT conversion)

[Freke1]

Edit: Sry, link don't work anymore.

2nd edit:
the video is on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lK5jX2VLmi8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
an alternative soundtrack:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iA12aYRstY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Likay]

Great find!

[Freke1]

I saw it for the 3rd time in the cinema today
(2 Dolby 3D + 1 RealD)
had to after seeing the trailer at home.

[cybereality]

Ah man!

[relaxman]

thx for the link!
finally we can see a short, not fake trailer on our 3,5m silverscreen

[taz291819]

I watched it, and wasn't impressed in the least. Are we sure this isn't a conversion?

[Freke1]

To me it looks just like in the cinema and way bettar than any of these conversions that always looks bad when I watch them not crosseyed. The (moderate) 3D looks flat if You sit to close to the monitor, it looks bettar if You sit a few meters away which is more like in the cinema.

[Likay]

It's not a conversion (in that case conversions are fine with me). Avatar looks a lot better on a bigger screen though. The source media probably could have a little higher quality but is more than watchable.
Remember that moviemakers just can't use the same high separation as the ordinary stereogamer. Which means a lesser effect also.

[BlackShark]

It looks gorgeous ! Great find !

[twisterbr]

awesome...
just awesome !!!!!!

[cybereality]

I don't know, it looked rather flat to me. But now that I think about it, it looked kinda flat in the theaters too...

[relaxman]

"it looked rather flat to me."

Also to me, but only the wide scene at the beginning.
But as sayed before for a 2,5 hour movie on a big imax screen, high separation
can make headache. And even little separation can look good on a very big screen.
I dont think they make a wider separated version for 3dtv-s. Or maybe this is the reason why
it will be only available in 2011?

[taz291819]

To me it looks just like in the cinema and way bettar than any of these conversions that always looks bad when I watch them not crosseyed. The (moderate) 3D looks flat if You sit to close to the monitor, it looks bettar if You sit a few meters away which is more like in the cinema.

I sit 5.5 feet from my 61" display, and the 3D effect didn't look very good to me, it looked very flat.

[adf2006]

9 feet from my 9 foot display, it looks absolutely great. Even better after playing with the parallax settings.

[Freke1]

Yes, some of the scenes are very flat - I guess Cameron is a n00b
The thing is when the cinema screen is 20 meters away he can't really use a big difference between the 2 views (because 3D objects 20 meters away looks very similar to the 2 eyes). So when You watch the 2 very similar views close up it looks flat. With the toe-in cameras the pop-out is reduced.
I do think some of the scenes look very good and some very flat, I sit 2.5 meters away. I don't undastan why he made it like that, but I have still seen it many times

[taz291819]

Ok, I take my comments back. The first one I downloaded didn't have English audio, and looked like crap. I happened to look on 3D-Blog yesterday, and they had a higher quality version (from the original source) with English audio. It looked pretty freakin' good.

[cybereality]

Ok, I am downloading the full quality video now. My comments were based on the YT3D version.

[relaxman]

it has a higher separation?
or "just" a better quality?

[Likay]

Separation is fixed. Everything else would be conversions.

[cybereality]

Yes, I watched the 1080P side-by-side video and it looked a whole lot better than what was on YouTube. There was a good amount of depth to it and in some ways it may have looked even better than in the theater. Still not at the level of a 3d game, but it looked nice for sure.