Stereoscopic Snakeoil?

Post Reply
User avatar
cybereality
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Posts: 11407
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:18 pm

Post by cybereality »

Welder wrote:Sounds like a possible fraudulent attempt.
The more I look at it, the more it looks like thats the case. This guy is also selling on Amazon (not currently available though). Here is what one very enthusiastic reviewer had to say:
beta on Amazon.com wrote:When I first got these glasses I thought they were a hoax. They looked like there was no possible way they'd work. But I read the instructions and tried them anyway, and they work! It's amazing! I've never seen my TV picture look so clear or realistic before. It's almost like looking out a window. And the really cool thing is that I've tried these on dozens and dozens of movies, Harry Potter (Quiddich is awesome in 3-D), Lord of the Rings, Shrek 2 (that one looked especially good, almost like watching the movie in a Viewmaster) Pirates of the Caribbean, and I could go on and on. It even worked on things I wouldn't expect it to, like the black and white part at the beginning of Van Helsing, and even on some flat Disney cartoons, Tarzan and Bambi II (I couldn't believe that when I saw it!)
But then I looked at the other reviews from the same user. They were all spamming about how good regular movies look with these "3D" glasses and always had a link back to the sellers page. You can read some of them, clearly its the seller posting under false accounts:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-rev ... KS7G1O6RK/

Now I really want to order a pair, if nothing else just to find out what the deal is. Even if he faked a bunch of feedback, it can't all be fake or else he wouldn't be making any money. So a good percentage of people must have somehow saw something. Maybe this is some sort of placebo effect, I don't know. But from a psychological angle it would be interesting to know how the mind could be tricked into seeing 3D without stereoscopic means. That aspect is fairly interesting if that is indeed what is happening.
User avatar
yuriythebest
Petrif-Eyed
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Kiev, ukraine

Post by yuriythebest »

cybereality wrote:
Welder wrote:Sounds like a possible fraudulent attempt.
The more I look at it, the more it looks like thats the case. This guy is also selling on Amazon (not currently available though). Here is what one very enthusiastic reviewer had to say:
beta on Amazon.com wrote:When I first got these glasses I thought they were a hoax. They looked like there was no possible way they'd work. But I read the instructions and tried them anyway, and they work! It's amazing! I've never seen my TV picture look so clear or realistic before. It's almost like looking out a window. And the really cool thing is that I've tried these on dozens and dozens of movies, Harry Potter (Quiddich is awesome in 3-D), Lord of the Rings, Shrek 2 (that one looked especially good, almost like watching the movie in a Viewmaster) Pirates of the Caribbean, and I could go on and on. It even worked on things I wouldn't expect it to, like the black and white part at the beginning of Van Helsing, and even on some flat Disney cartoons, Tarzan and Bambi II (I couldn't believe that when I saw it!)
But then I looked at the other reviews from the same user. They were all spamming about how good regular movies look with these "3D" glasses and always had a link back to the sellers page. You can read some of them, clearly its the seller posting under false accounts:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-rev ... KS7G1O6RK/

Now I really want to order a pair, if nothing else just to find out what the deal is. Even if he faked a bunch of feedback, it can't all be fake or else he wouldn't be making any money. So a good percentage of people must have somehow saw something. Maybe this is some sort of placebo effect, I don't know. But from a psychological angle it would be interesting to know how the mind could be tricked into seeing 3D without stereoscopic means. That aspect is fairly interesting if that is indeed what is happening.
right, but that's a dilema. Buy a product that you already know not to trully work and contribute to his sales, not buy one and you can't truly criticize it. in any case, why not just homebrew these glasses using cardboard or something?
Oculus Rift / 3d Sucks - 2D FTW!!!
User avatar
android78
Certif-Eyable!
Posts: 990
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:38 am

Post by android78 »

cybereality wrote: Now I really want to order a pair, if nothing else just to find out what the deal is. Even if he faked a bunch of feedback, it can't all be fake or else he wouldn't be making any money. So a good percentage of people must have somehow saw something. Maybe this is some sort of placebo effect, I don't know. But from a psychological angle it would be interesting to know how the mind could be tricked into seeing 3D without stereoscopic means. That aspect is fairly interesting if that is indeed what is happening.
I agree with Yuri on this one... I'd only purchas it if he agrees to refund all expenses, including freight. That way you can try it out and return it without being out of pocket. Also he will not make any money out of you if it is a scam.

I believe the idea behind it is that the eye doesn't have to focus for the image to appear in focus using pinhole lenses. Therefore, your eye MAY naturally focus further away when your brain believes an object should appear further away. Since you still see it in focus, the illusion has worked and you'd have a slight feeling of 3D. Therefore, it probably isn't a total scam, but still a ripoff.
I don't think it would be anything like true S3D though and I also have the concern that people may get a small effect and then think they have experienced 3D and can't be bothered spending more then $20 on a S3D effect.
User avatar
stee1hed
Cross Eyed!
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:22 pm

Post by stee1hed »

At last the secret of Spider Man's vision revealed!

:D :D :D

Remember that old tv show, Spider Man's eyes coverings were actually white pieces (of plastic?) with several pin holes in them. I always thought they would inhibit his vision!
User avatar
staticbuddha
Cross Eyed!
Posts: 150
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:14 am
Location: England, Dartford

Post by staticbuddha »

-- this site sells them for £10 -

http://www.jdharris.co.uk/product_info. ... le-glasses

-- Step by Step to create your own with foil

http://www.instructables.com/id/Pinhole-Eyeglasses/

-- New york stereosocpic society review on these glasses and about selling these on ebay

http://www.ny3d.org/2007/10/tv_eyes_3d_ ... nufac.html
User avatar
Okta
Golden Eyed Wiseman! (or woman!)
Posts: 1515
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:22 am

Post by Okta »

Just a guess here but maybe what they are getting at is the pinholes are setup so in theory only one eye can see each section of the screen. Because most peoples eyes will have some small differences this might create the perception of different focal lengths because one eye will focus on a spot on the screen while the other eye may only be able to see around the object in its 'periferal' view and create psuedo 3d.
I imagine this would require the correct pinhole setup at the correct interocular width with the correct sized screen at the correct viewing distance.
If this is the idea i could believe there would be a novelty effect.
User avatar
yuriythebest
Petrif-Eyed
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Kiev, ukraine

Post by yuriythebest »

hmm then perhaps cybereality should indeed try them just so the rest of us don't have to. I still think the effect will be sub-anaglyph if any at all.
Oculus Rift / 3d Sucks - 2D FTW!!!
User avatar
LukePC1
Golden Eyed Wiseman! (or woman!)
Posts: 1387
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 11:30 am
Location: Europe
Contact:

Post by LukePC1 »

Okta wrote:Just a guess here but maybe what they are getting at is the pinholes are setup so in theory only one eye can see each section of the screen. Because most peoples eyes will have some small differences this might create the perception of different focal lengths because one eye will focus on a spot on the screen while the other eye may only be able to see around the object in its 'periferal' view and create psuedo 3d.
I imagine this would require the correct pinhole setup at the correct interocular width with the correct sized screen at the correct viewing distance.
If this is the idea i could believe there would be a novelty effect.

That brings me to the Idea about blocking out parts of the screen and display similar (S-3D stuff) in each area. If the pinholes were set correctly you could make some sort of interlaced with only the glasses...
Or build a viewmaster to watch the pictures in the galery... or something similar...

Disadvantage: halve (or less) resolution
pro + cheap glasses, would work with every monitor and any field sequential driver... (.jps)
Play Nations at WAR with this code to get 5.000$ as a Starterbonus:
ayqz1u0s
http://mtbs3d.com/naw/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

AMD x2 4200+ 2gb Dualchannel
GF 7900gs for old CRT with Elsa Revelator SG's
currently 94.24 Forceware and 94.24 Stereo with XP sp2!
User avatar
cybereality
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Posts: 11407
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:18 pm

Post by cybereality »

The suspense was killing me, so I just bit the bullet and ordered a pair. At the very least I can take a few pictures and then return it for my money back.

Although since you guys mentioned it, I'm interested to see if these glasses could be used for some DIY stuff. I've got these mini-fresnel lens to try to maybe get a higher FOV from the VR920. Except when using the fresnels its all blurry. Maybe these pin-hole glasses could somehow focus the blurry image I'm getting. I don't know, but maybe this guy actually did figure something out. I mean, thats a lot of feedback to have faked. I guess we will know soon enough...
Last edited by cybereality on Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
crim3
Certif-Eyed!
Posts: 642
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 3:11 am
Location: Valencia (Spain)

Post by crim3 »

Maybe he just should have called them "vision enhancer glasses". I have a minimal base knowledge about photography, and the theory makes sense. But also the same theory makes it clear that these is not stereo 3D. And here it is the problem. The same all problem!! Misinformation!
User avatar
cybereality
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Posts: 11407
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:18 pm

Post by cybereality »

The "TV Eyes 3-D Glasses" have finally arrived. Shipped quickly, packed in a small box with some newspaper comics.

I open it up to find a pair of glasses and a pamphlet in some clear wrapping:

Sweet, at least its not a bag of pebbles! :D

I went into this knowing it was some sort of rip-off, so I wasn't expecting much. In fact, I kept checking my bank account balance, just to make sure I didn't get scammed for real (it happens). So when I realized these "TV Eyes 3-D Glasses" had a metal frame, I was pretty impressed. I figured they'd be plastic, at best. They felt really heavy and solid. So even if this is a hoax, at least the dude makes it look good. The part where the lens goes just has a hard plastic shell with a horizontal slit of pin-holes (8 holes each). So its not just a run of the mill pair of pin-hole glasses. So this has me interested now. As you can see below the glasses look bogus, but still appear high-quality:
TV_Eyes_01.jpg
The frame is surprisingly thick and heavy:
TV_Eyes_02.jpg
The best part is the "manual" that comes with it. Honestly, reading this this was so funny that it was worth the $20 alone. If you thought stereo-3d was complex, wait until you hear about this new tv eyes 3d. I'm going to have to scan this in, cause its just too funny. It just sounds like a bunch of BS really, but at least it does make the distinction that it is not true stereoscopic 3d. Here is a crappy photo:

Image

At this point I just had to try the glasses out. I mean, you never know. When I put them on I experienced what the manual refers to as "bug-eyes", this sort of doubling of the image. The tops and bottoms of my vision were blocked off like when wearing an HMD. I could see a horizontal sliver of vision. So far this seems like a novelty item, but I thought I'd give it a chance. So I tried them out on my PC with a few movies. First I tried that T2 1080p trailer that someone else had linked. Didn't work. Wasn't seeing anything. Figured I'd try a DVD, so I threw on the Matrix Revolutions. Lots of special effects and action, I thought it might work. At first it didn't seem like it was doing anything really, except making it harder to see. I was wearing glasses and they didn't fit right because the the heavy frames on these so-called 3-d glasses. So I tried them just without my glasses, what the hell. Now this is interesting, they do actually make the image more clear. In fact, I could use them instead of my prescriptions. It was still difficult to see (because of the black bars and double-images) but it was pretty clear. So the glasses do something, and are indeed based on the pin-hole effect. But I'm not seeing any sort of 3D, but I keep on going...

I tried a bunch of different scenes from the movie, so far there was no sort of 3-D effect at all. It did make the image clear, and also the contrast better (because of the immersion of the black shields). So there was something going on, but it was giving me a headache. It makes your eye muscles focus differently. Like the strain you might get from an HMD but like times two. The interesting thing is that the image doubling appears similar to when you look at a real stereo-3d movie on page-flipping without glasses. So I almost see where the guy is going with this. You see like 3 or 4 overlapping ghost images that randomly offset from eye to eye. Its a sort of parallax effect, an optical illusion I think. Not that it necessarily works, but that I can see there is some science put behind this. Its not just a total gag. Finally on one scene I saw something. It was only for a second, but it was something. I paused it to look closer. The scene was a parking lot with 3 rows of lights on the ceiling. If I would shift my head to the left or right, I could see that weird pseudoscopic effect. Like when you move your head around when wearing real 3d glasses. So it was tricking the eye into something, but it just felt random for the most part. But I can almost see how it could sort of work. So I keep trying.

Now on the final scene in Matrix Revolutions, I started to get some effect. I'm not sure if it was 3d, actually, I know it wasn't 3d. But the scene did feel more "realistic" somehow. Now I think I understand what they were saying with the seeing the atmosphere thing. I kept taking them off and putting them back on. It made a difference. Mind you I am sitting 10 feet from my tv and see it somewhat clearly without my prescription glasses. Now on this one final part with all the sentinels flying around, it did look 3d! I thought maybe I was just bugging, so I rewinded and played it again. Yep, with fast horizontal motion there is a 3d effect. I played this scene over a few times, with the glasses and without. Honestly, it did almost appear to be 3d. The colors looked richer, picture more clear, and had that psuedoscopic effect. After that scene, again no 3d effects. I tried some different movies, some animation, nothing else seemed to work. So while this should still be considered a "novelty" item, its not a straight scam.

Then just to humor myself I tried out some games. I tried HL2, GRID, a few others. No dice. But somehow Devil May Cry 4 (DMC4) demo had some 3d effects. Not as much on the game, but just on the title screen. It really did appear that the text and logo were at screen-depth and the background behind it. Even when moving my head around, the text would shift slightly in the opposite vector. It was an absolute minimal amount, but it was in the correct direction. Like if the text were 1cm in front of the screen. I have no way to explain this, it may actually be worth further investigation. However it was nowhere even close to what the game looks like in real stereo-3d. It was a 3d-like effect, but it was clearly there. The first benchmark demo appeared somewhat 3d. I would put it at 2.2D if that were possible. I could take the glasses off for a second and then it would just look flat. So again, the glasses had some sort of effect but nothing worth actually paying for.

Overall, its a crap product not worth your time (unless just for lolz like I did). The vendor is spreading mis-information regarding stereo-3d and taking advantage of clueless buyers. However it is not a scam, so I guess the seller has a right to sell his product. Although it is falsely marketed, the product does have some merit. Its a novelty effect, yes, but it is something. I'd put it in the same category as those "x-ray specs" from old comics or the hoverboard plans you find in the back pages of popular science. I could see how someone gullible could be fooled. Especially since they do indeed enhance clarity of vision. The way I see it, there are probably a bunch of people out there without perfect 20/20 vision. Some see eye doctors, others do not. I wouldn't be surprised if those people (that don't realize their vision sucks) are the same people uninformed enough to order these "tv eyes 3d glasses". Its a bit low, but there are many products just like this that are perfectly legal (herbal supplements, etc.). So I guess I just discovered what everyone else just assumed from the start: the glasses are bogus. But honestly, I'm actually going to keep them just for fun. Wait until you guys see the "instruction manual", its comedy gold!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by cybereality on Thu May 28, 2009 6:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
cybereality
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Posts: 11407
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:18 pm

Post by cybereality »

Here is the best part, the "instructions":
TV_Eyes_03.jpg
TV_Eyes_04.jpg
My apologizes if you are on 56K! :)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by cybereality on Thu May 28, 2009 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
yuriythebest
Petrif-Eyed
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Kiev, ukraine

Post by yuriythebest »

wow that was a monster of a review, thanks for taking the time and financial effort to write this
caution: this type of 3-D will not jump out of the screen at you. Instead t should increase the depth and focus of the picture, making it look more 3-three-dimensional and real
this statement seems to contradict itself :)
however the glasses themselves look stylish. Still, even a pair of quality anaglyph glasses or better yet a 10$ xforce glasses pair will blow this away price/performance wise.
Oculus Rift / 3d Sucks - 2D FTW!!!
User avatar
stee1hed
Cross Eyed!
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:22 pm

Post by stee1hed »

cybereality,
Excellent review. I love all the details and pictures.
User avatar
Likay
Petrif-Eyed
Posts: 2913
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 4:34 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by Likay »

Interesting read! Amazingly well done review! Some astonishing and unexpected results too! :D By the way: Congratz to the hottest topic around! :D

Image

:D

cheers
Mb: Asus P5W DH Deluxe
Cpu: C2D E6600
Gb: Nvidia 7900GT + 8800GTX
3D:100" passive projector polarized setup + 22" IZ3D
Image
crim3
Certif-Eyed!
Posts: 642
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 3:11 am
Location: Valencia (Spain)

Post by crim3 »

Maybe he should be more careful when using the word "3D", but it seems quite honest overall.

Now it's time for freke to send free pinhole cardboard glasses to the world :)
Last edited by crim3 on Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
yuriythebest
Petrif-Eyed
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Kiev, ukraine

Post by yuriythebest »

crim3 wrote:Maybe he should be more careful when using the word "3D", but it seems quite honest overall.

Not it's time for freke to send free pinhole cardboard glasses to the world :)
freke c'mon ppl are waiting here. could this service be any slower?
Oculus Rift / 3d Sucks - 2D FTW!!!
User avatar
Freke1
Certif-Eyable!
Posts: 1060
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 pm
Location: Wake Island

Post by Freke1 »

Hi, I'm busy making 3D videos... no time for pinholes sry :D
Also I must game some more... oh and I must remember to save up to buy a projector:
Image
User avatar
cybereality
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Posts: 11407
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:18 pm

Re: Stereoscopic Snakeoil?

Post by cybereality »

Just so you guys know I did return the bogus specs and got my money back. I should have left negative feedback but I'm a nice guy and decided not to. I can't believe the dude is still selling them on eBay, what a scam.
User avatar
cybereality
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Posts: 11407
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:18 pm

Re: Stereoscopic Snakeoil?

Post by cybereality »

Wow, this girl is still around pulling this same scam over 2 years later:
http://stores.ebay.com/TV-Eyes-3-D" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The sad part is that many of her auctions actually have bids on them. People are buying this crap.
Post Reply

Return to “General Stereoscopic 3D Discussion”