So,quite since so long!!!
let me first put some questions Where are the reviews of

Darkest Hour 3D
Jhon Carter 3D
Green Hornet 3D
Green Lantern 3D
Lion King 3D
Harry Potter 3D
Puss in Boots 3D
Smurfs 3D
Ghost Rider 3D

Journey 2 The Mystreious Islend 3D
TINTIN 3D


Out of first nine only Marked bold has impressed rest were ok some are CRAP (Of course 3D point of View)

I Seriously loved JOURNEY 2 and TINTIN

Again for TINTIN hates off to Steven Spielberg SIR.
its beyond argue MUST WATCH for every 3D/ANIMATION/COMIC & MOVIE lover
with FULL FAMILY (My grand pa loved TINTIN in 3D)

Why so long silence??

Yep,Agree Avengers do not have good 3D effect sadly i have also noticed this case that in some scenes one eye has blurry picture which disappointed me for otherwise good movie
most people in movie hall & even after leaving were discussing HULK and IRONMAN so yes they have stolen attention. Always loved Robert Downey Jr as IRONMAN so no point in appose
i think a few actors can exhibit better attitude of IRONMAN though he started looking old but see some times oldies look much impressive as i liked sean connery more in THE ROCK & ENTRAPMENT then in & AS JAMES BOND

I have seen this movie in Active 3D system theater may be DLP Linked i don know but those are bulky shades with dark red plastic around LCD which is way thicker then usual i think those are DLP link glasses but don know it can be RF Glasses also

They were making skin tone unnatural every thing looked little darken and with less vibrance and sort of you look through dark sun glasses at 1600Hrs when world is bright and you percive late evening

I know i have to avoid this theatre but its really near by my home (1Km away) so i go there same franchise (CINEMAX) has passive theater also but its around 10KMs away and there is Horror Traffic in peak hours.once your city become megacity and you start pay for it by facing hell traffic problems,but i think will go REALD Passive Cinemax only now onwards as QUALITY MATTERS!!

Sorry got little side tracked

So agree with bad conversion and yes this movie has some sort of one eye bluriness problem and bad conversion with said "Conservative" flatness

I think i hate conversions its just cheapo way to encash 3D Hype and will eventually drain interest of people from powerful medium and its said in our country INSTANT RIPED MANGOES TASTE TWICE SOUR EVEN IF THEY LOOK GOLDEN

WHEN there will be MOVIEGRADE 3D??

I think every 3D movie must clearly quote its SHOT IN 3D or CONVERTED 3D as most conversion don give good results (Except TITANIC as it was a master piece and converted only as it was a master piece and converted FRAME By FRAME with Director's Touch)but no one does it that way i love to see original JURASSIC PARK in 3D if Steven Spielberg SIR consider conversion.

Sure there should be a dedicated section for movie....

I'm not crazy...not crazy...not crazy am I....not crazy.

Regards,
Neil

Not crazy...

Still haven't seen it or even made a pair of "stereo to mono"-glasses yet. Had to do some work in the weekend and the rest of the time the beautiful weather forced room for some grilling and socializing. I will, however, see it someday!

It's weird, I saw more depth 3D in Avenger than in Prometheus.

While watching the Avengers in 3D...were you watching it in 2D, but standing at the back of the theater? It's the only explanation I could think of.

Regards,
Neil

I actually went to see this twice at the cinemas, both in 3D and both using RealD. As a side note, this is in Australia $21 a ticket and both times I went with my partner so was a $42 experience for us (each viewing).
First time - this was in a Village Vmax http://villagecinemas.com.au/Cinemas/VMax.htm cinema which are pretty big screens. Watching this I thought it was amazing! The 3D was varied in terms of depth, but was always reasonable to me, and was there for certain during the points where I felt it mattered most. The projectionist at that cinema must be given praise because it was setup perfectly with brightness obviously at the correct level to compensate for the 50% loss due the 3D. The sound in the cinema was also set to the right level so that it was loud, but not hurting or distorting.
Second time - I went to a smaller screen cinema. This was pretty underwhelming, especially since the experience the first time was pretty much spot on. The brightness seemed half what it should be. The sound was (as seems common these days) far too loud, to the point that the speakers were constantly distorting. The smaller screen size meant that the 3D appeared really shallow, and nothing in comparison to the first time.

One comment is that neither times did I notice the extreme anomalies with the conversion to 3D that Neil is referring to! There were times when it was a little flatter then it should be, but overall it was a great experience in 3D. Maybe I've just got so used to the regular customer experience that I don't notice it as much now since I've not bothered with custom 3D implementations in ages due to time constraints.

I think one lesson here is that we really need to learn which cinemas have projectionists that know there stuff, and stick with them!

Well Confirmed
REALD has much much better 3D results

I have seen MB3 and was quite impressed with good 3D
Nice and clear 3d Effect throughout movie storyline is little weak
but overall good movie a nice addon in mib franchise