The Number One Resource For Stereoscopic 3D Excitement!
https://www.mtbs3d.com/phpbb/
I have the C9 model and tried 3D Vision with it. Unfortunately had pretty much ghosting. I'm also curious if the CX can do 3D with BFI. I think chances are pretty high.ZePRiNCE wrote: ↑Wed Apr 22, 2020 5:09 am I'm very interested on this subject, I read the other thread mentioning BFI, and I also read a few days ago the LG new generation has BFI
I have a LG C6, but I fear the day it will die. I don't have other 3D displays.
I play in 3D for 10 years but I've always been with 3DTV (Plasma 1080p, then LED 4K, then OLED 4K) so I really don't know the "3D Vision Kit" world.
I have some questions :
1) I assume a 3D Vision Kit will be necessary, right ? (Glasses + Emitter)
2) The 3D mode would be CRT Mode ?
3) Would it be necessary to output 120 fps ? Is there "desync" if frame drops ?
4) How does it behave with the VRR ? (I guess it's not compatible with 3D enabled)
5) It would be true 4K per eye (so better than a Passive 4K 3DTV, in term of displayed resolution) ?
It is very unlikely that this works but I'll try anyway. AFAIK we do not only need HDMI 2.1 on both ends but also a HDMI 2.1 cable which is still very expensive (3-4 times more expensive than a HDMI 2.0 cable). I hope prices for the cable will drop when there are more devices available supporting hdmi 2.1.
This video unfortunately seems to give you the reason, you can observe it better if you play it at x0.25 speed at 8:38 minute which is motionpro (bfi) on High.russellk wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 6:46 am I really hope I'm wrong but I'm not hopeful about these working well with 3d vision.
Hopefully the way the BFI works will become clearer with time, but I've seen some videos and comments that it's almost like a rolling scan than a full blanking interval, so I think crosstalk is going to be a major problem.
Maybe I'm just a natual pessimist!
Tested and 60hz was still the highest I could choose for 4K.Pauldusler wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 2:20 amIt is very unlikely that this works but I'll try anyway. AFAIK we do not only need HDMI 2.1 on both ends but also a HDMI 2.1 cable which is still very expensive (3-4 times more expensive than a HDMI 2.0 cable). I hope prices for the cable will drop when there are more devices available supporting hdmi 2.1.
Looks pretty poor ;_;. I think this destroys all hopes?!Enzel wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 5:13 pmThis video unfortunately seems to give you the reason, you can observe it better if you play it at x0.25 speed at 8:38 minute which is motionpro (bfi) on High.russellk wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 6:46 am I really hope I'm wrong but I'm not hopeful about these working well with 3d vision.
Hopefully the way the BFI works will become clearer with time, but I've seen some videos and comments that it's almost like a rolling scan than a full blanking interval, so I think crosstalk is going to be a major problem.
Maybe I'm just a natual pessimist!
https://youtu.be/HizE34yednA
Might it be looking like a rolling scan because of the camera used to film ? Just guessing ...Pauldusler wrote: ↑Thu Apr 30, 2020 6:33 amLooks pretty poor ;_;. I think this destroys all hopes?!Enzel wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 5:13 pmThis video unfortunately seems to give you the reason, you can observe it better if you play it at x0.25 speed at 8:38 minute which is motionpro (bfi) on High.russellk wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 6:46 am I really hope I'm wrong but I'm not hopeful about these working well with 3d vision.
Hopefully the way the BFI works will become clearer with time, but I've seen some videos and comments that it's almost like a rolling scan than a full blanking interval, so I think crosstalk is going to be a major problem.
Maybe I'm just a natual pessimist!
https://youtu.be/HizE34yednA
