New 3DVision Ready monitor to replace old 2233RZ
Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2019 8:54 am
Hi,
I am trying to decide which monitor to buy after using a venerable 2233RZ (16:10 1680x1050) for years. After reading around (included here https://www.mtbs3d.com/phpbb/viewtopic. ... 81&t=23314) I have finally kept these two options:
Asus PG258Q 16:9 1080p 144Hz @ 3D
Asus PG27VQ 16:9 1440p 120Hz @ 3D
I have a Strix GTX1060 6Gb. So I am not asking for really high fps, but still a nice experience. You can guess the fps I use to play at.
Considering that it could be that no new 3D Ready monitors are released from now on, my final question is what is worth more?
A- PG258Q. Playing in 3D at 144Hz (prad.de says the difference is worth) and in 2D up to 240Hz, and a more easy resolution for the GPU but to stay with a monitor a bit low in specs (resolution, size) looking at the future and a feeling of smaller screen (I really miss the 16:10 ratio)
B- PG27VQ. To have a more modern screen (resolution and curved surface) also a bigger one (the 27" will give me the monitor height I miss in 16:9 24" screens) but playing in 3D at "only" 120Hz and a higher resolution that will ask for an upgrade in the GPU (I could get a second hand Strix GTX1080, but nothing higher)
For years I used to play everything I could in 3D without any hint of headache or sickness, but a few years ago I started to feel a little sick after 1 hour or so, so I consider the 144Hz a nice thing (but I could be wrong, maybe the problem was ghosting with the old 2233RZ, or simply that I have to use prescription glasses when gaming, who knows…).
In face of these options what do you think would be more interesting, or what would you do? Let's see if I can get some inspiration from your comments, as I am in a closed circle right now.
Thanks
I am trying to decide which monitor to buy after using a venerable 2233RZ (16:10 1680x1050) for years. After reading around (included here https://www.mtbs3d.com/phpbb/viewtopic. ... 81&t=23314) I have finally kept these two options:
Asus PG258Q 16:9 1080p 144Hz @ 3D
Asus PG27VQ 16:9 1440p 120Hz @ 3D
I have a Strix GTX1060 6Gb. So I am not asking for really high fps, but still a nice experience. You can guess the fps I use to play at.
Considering that it could be that no new 3D Ready monitors are released from now on, my final question is what is worth more?
A- PG258Q. Playing in 3D at 144Hz (prad.de says the difference is worth) and in 2D up to 240Hz, and a more easy resolution for the GPU but to stay with a monitor a bit low in specs (resolution, size) looking at the future and a feeling of smaller screen (I really miss the 16:10 ratio)
B- PG27VQ. To have a more modern screen (resolution and curved surface) also a bigger one (the 27" will give me the monitor height I miss in 16:9 24" screens) but playing in 3D at "only" 120Hz and a higher resolution that will ask for an upgrade in the GPU (I could get a second hand Strix GTX1080, but nothing higher)
For years I used to play everything I could in 3D without any hint of headache or sickness, but a few years ago I started to feel a little sick after 1 hour or so, so I consider the 144Hz a nice thing (but I could be wrong, maybe the problem was ghosting with the old 2233RZ, or simply that I have to use prescription glasses when gaming, who knows…).
In face of these options what do you think would be more interesting, or what would you do? Let's see if I can get some inspiration from your comments, as I am in a closed circle right now.
Thanks