Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV !!

Post Reply
User avatar
Recostar
Cross Eyed!
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:09 pm
Location: Toronto , North York

Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV !!

Post by Recostar »

Samsung is grabbing the bull by its little 3D Horns and running with it. This is an awesome price for such a huge TV ,hopefully this will stimulate more interest for those that have already bought TVs last year and were thinking about picking up another one, for under $1,000 why not make it 3D.
Here's the link to the article .

http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/news/sh ... 1,000/5232
Image
User avatar
tritosine5G
Terrif-eying the Ladies!
Posts: 894
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:35 am
Location: As far from Hold Display guys as possible!!! ^2

Re: Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV

Post by tritosine5G »

These are the same guys who held 120hz captive for so long
-Biased for 0 Gen HMD's to hell and back must be one hundred percent hell bent bias!
User avatar
Recostar
Cross Eyed!
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:09 pm
Location: Toronto , North York

Re: Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV

Post by Recostar »

tritosine wrote:These are the same guys who held 120hz captive for so long
Samsung + 3D = High five baby !!

Image[/url]
Image
User avatar
Neil
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Posts: 6882
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV

Post by Neil »

Ummm, that picture. Is it of a cat or a young tiger?

As it is jumping in the air, maybe it is thinking..."Soon, I will eat you.". :D

Regards,
Neil
User avatar
cirk2
Certif-Eyed!
Posts: 521
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV

Post by cirk2 »

I think it look more like a lynx (look at the fur on the tip of his ears


@topic:

whwerent there a thread about the same tv in wicht it was said that it has a crappy resolution?
Image
User avatar
tritosine5G
Terrif-eying the Ladies!
Posts: 894
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:35 am
Location: As far from Hold Display guys as possible!!! ^2

Re: Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV

Post by tritosine5G »

cirk2 wrote:it was said that it has a crappy resolution?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLjIOzQTBHc[/youtube]

no ! Not resolution matters but whether its checkerboard or not ! 1366*768 is very cool resolution in itself. :evil:
-Biased for 0 Gen HMD's to hell and back must be one hundred percent hell bent bias!
User avatar
Okta
Golden Eyed Wiseman! (or woman!)
Posts: 1515
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:22 am

Re: Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV

Post by Okta »

I have teh old version of this and its a great TV. Th res is fine but 3D is pretty ghosty in high contrast scenes but all new 3d tv's are probably worse.
"I did not chip in ten grand to seed a first investment round to build value for a Facebook acquisition."
Notch on the FaceDisgrace buyout.
User avatar
cirk2
Certif-Eyed!
Posts: 521
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV

Post by cirk2 »

tritosine wrote:
cirk2 wrote:it was said that it has a crappy resolution?

no ! Not resolution matters but whether its checkerboard or not ! 1366*768 is very cool resolution in itself. :evil:

Shure checkboard is crap, but 1080p Checkboard is still better than 1366*768 checkboard...
Image
User avatar
Recostar
Cross Eyed!
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:09 pm
Location: Toronto , North York

Re: Who said that 3D TVs are expensive ? - $1,000 50" 3D TV

Post by Recostar »

This is a little off topic but I think this is a much better High five , Just my opinion.

Image
Image
Post Reply

Return to “General Stereoscopic 3D Discussion”