Apart from the HD element, I can confidently say that I get better quality 3D in the home than I see in the Cinema. Now, just for more content to watch!!
![Crying or Very Sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Gae43
I'll have a word with my local Cineworld then!!!Ummm.. no its not. Either the theater you went to had a ghetto setup or you are smoking some serious stuff.
I have seen nearly every 3D film released since 2007 in RealD digital theaters (including The Final Destination) and I can tell you for a fact that there is NO ghosting whatsoever.
Sorry, but i too have seen nearly every 3D movie that has been released in recent years and minor ghosting has been visible in nearly every one. setup? Maybe. I think the technology needs a little more refinement before it is 100%. But, 95% is ohh soo good on a huge screen!cybereality wrote:Ummm.. no its not. Either the theater you went to had a ghetto setup or you are smoking some serious stuff.
I have seen nearly every 3D film released since 2007 in RealD digital theaters (including The Final Destination) and I can tell you for a fact that there is NO ghosting whatsoever. I am not doubting the quality of your home rig, but I question the experience you had in the RealD theater. It does not coincide with my own experience and, like I said, I have seen at least a dozen films in RealD. However I do agree that the home experience can be a better one. I can certainly achieve greater depth and/or pop-out in 3D games at home than I have seen in any film (barring some IMAX3D films which had an almost holographic quality to them). So I hear where you are coming from, but RealD has *NO* ghosting.
Come on...Gae43 wrote:Well I went to see "Final Destination" in 3D last night and even though the 3D looked nice, especially in HD, there were several moments throughout the film where ghosting was evident. Not enough to spoil my enjoyment (of the 3D, not the film) but I get no ghosting with my set up.....Extreme 3D system + Stereoscopic Player (using page flip) + X1 Infocus DLP projector.
Apart from the HD element, I can confidently say that I get better quality 3D in the home than I see in the Cinema. Now, just for more content to watch!!![]()
Gae43
LOL! Cyber you kill me - I am rolling in the floor. I saw louie anderson once at the hard rock casino in Tampa, he asked me what the hell was I smoking, and to give him some! LOL!cybereality wrote:Ummm.. no its not. Either the theater you went to had a ghetto setup or you are smoking some serious stuff.
Come on...
An X1 with shutters? oh come on...
Sorry, i had his exact same setup and it was very good. The only drawbacks were resolution and a slight tint difference in each eye. but, no ghosting. at all. same with my current dlp setup.cybereality wrote:I really can't believe this. Gae43 is claiming a 7 year old SVGA (800x600) projector running at 85Hz with some generic shutter glasses that are just as old are somehow better than a state-of-the-art 4K x 4K professional-grade digital projector with a 144Hz Z-screen and circular polarized passive glasses?!?!?!?!? Come on, someone back me up here.
I didn't say any of that.I really can't believe this. Gae43 is claiming a 7 year old SVGA (800x600) projector running at 85Hz with some generic shutter glasses that are just as old are somehow better than a state-of-the-art 4K x 4K professional-grade digital projector with a 144Hz Z-screen and circular polarized passive glasses?!?!?!?!? Come on, someone back me up here
First off, all the conversions are sub par, the colors are not great on those. I know because i have a few of those movies myself. (i use 2 720p projectors with Dolby 3D glasses.)Gae43 wrote:Come on...
An X1 with shutters? oh come on...
Believe what you want ....I have no way of proving it.....but I'm very happy with my 3D set up on a 76" screen and I think the 3D quality, measure for measure, is on a par with the RealD films that I've seen in the cinema.
I'll just keep on enjoying watching my converted side by side movies in 3D in the comfort of my own home.![]()
Gae43
Wow, you guys are taking my original post so seriously.....incidentally, I can get 85 Hz at 1024 x 768 resolution (with no flicker) and some of my DVDs are original, side by side or field sequential 3D movies with perfect left and right sides.Real D = Passive, minimal ghosting.
X1 with shutters = 30 Hz per eye, UNBEARABLE flicker.
With just that we debunk the whole "3d quality" argument.
That's not even taking into account other, REALLY important PQ aspects such as contrast ratio, which happens to be horrid in the X1 compared to the projectors used by real D, or resolution, (2k vs 800x600.) or color (16 million colors vs billions of colors.)
and more importantly the source... pristine 2k source vs a DVD anaglyph conversion with less than acceptable colors.
Well I went to see "Final Destination" in 3D last night and even though the 3D looked nice, especially in HD, there were several moments throughout the film where ghosting was evident. Not enough to spoil my enjoyment (of the 3D, not the film) but I get no ghosting with my set up.....Extreme 3D system + Stereoscopic Player (using page flip) + X1 Infocus DLP projector.
Apart from the HD element, I can confidently say that I get better quality 3D in the home than I see in the Cinema. Now, just for more content to watch!!
Ditto. It's all about cost and so far shuttersolutions are more costeffective than dual passive rigs. Other passive solutions are plagued with phenomenas as ghosting, tinting, hotspots etc.PalmerTech wrote:"Eventually" being the key word.I think shutters have the best shot of making 3D mass market at this point.