|
|
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 6:43 pm
|
Compact 180 deg fov HMD's still possible?
| Author |
Message |
|
3dpmaster
Two Eyed Hopeful
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:05 pm Posts: 61
|
Thanks for your comments,
Cnc is ideal but in 2003 when I was a teenager, there was no money for cnc and no 3D printer. I could only use some hobby materials and my brains.
Material list the casting resin for lenses: 12 euro diy spinning lens holder (fibreboard): 15 euro diy vacuum forming pump and ring hole (1mm aluminum): 15 euro polishing and sandpaper (p40 to p1000): 25 euro silicone mold (standard bathroom silicone) : 5 euro + drill from my parents.
Fabrication of the resin casted lens (March 2003): 1. The lens material index is calculated, then the curvature of the lens surface is drawn on paper (diameter is very important). 2. Vacuumforming by blowing surface into a hemisphere with custom diameter ring hole. 2 (note) The diameter of the lens itsself and the diameter of the vacuum formed hemisphere are custom. How smaller the hemisphere, how stronger the lens. 3. make a cylindrical shape and glue it WITHOUT GAPS on the inner side (for convex) or outher side(for concave) of the hemisphere. 4. Take the glued hemisphere and cylinder apart from the rest of the hemisphere around the cylinder by cutting (with siccors). 5. Put it into a mold like a ship (not over the open surface of the cylinder). you can put weights for maintain it right. 6. If the mold is dry, you can remove the 'ship'. 7. Poor the casting resin. 8. Let it dry. 9. remove it from the mold and grind the upper surface. 10. Fix it on a drillshaft (in the center) and let it spin. 11. Grind it with a sandpaper fixed on a metal shape with the same curvature as the lens. 12 polish in the same way. 13 remove from shaft and grind/polish the flat surface on a horizontal grinding/polishing disc.
I'll send an illustration because it is complicated that way .
_________________ Full immersive research:
HMD: SONY HMZ-T1 FOV: 40° diagonal
HMD project: FOV: >180°
|
| Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:06 am |
|
 |
|
3dpmaster
Two Eyed Hopeful
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:05 pm Posts: 61
|
PalmerTech wrote: The curve greatly magnifies the image, that is why it does not need traditional lenses. A projection surface only works with a collimated light source, such as a projection, and then you still need something to modify the focal length. The Focal length is the most difficult part 
_________________ Full immersive research:
HMD: SONY HMZ-T1 FOV: 40° diagonal
HMD project: FOV: >180°
|
| Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:49 am |
|
 |
|
PalmerTech
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:06 pm Posts: 1611
|
3dpmaster wrote: PalmerTech wrote: The curve greatly magnifies the image, that is why it does not need traditional lenses. A projection surface only works with a collimated light source, such as a projection, and then you still need something to modify the focal length. The Focal length is the most difficult part  Yes, I know. I was responding to Okta's idea of projecting the microdisplay's image onto a flat white curved surface instead of a mirror, and that it would not work unless you added another lens anyway. 
|
| Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:18 pm |
|
 |
|
cadcoke5
Cross Eyed!
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 8:43 pm Posts: 115 Location: near Lancaster, PA USA
|
I have previously mentioned the idea of using the flexible OLED displays for a Head Mounted Display. This would hopefully solve the issue of light on one portion of a projected image from somewhat washing out other portions of the screen. However, this technology has not been coming as fast as hoped. The writer in the article below says Samsung's late 2012 launch has been put off to perhaps early 2013. And even then, the mass market being perhaps delayed to 2014 or later. Of course we have CES 2013 coming up in Jan. Perhaps there will be some surprises. http://www.oled-info.com/thoughts-about ... -plausibleJoe Dunfee
|
| Wed Dec 19, 2012 5:43 pm |
|
 |
|
Okta
Golden Eyed Wiseman! (or woman!)
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:22 am Posts: 1420
|
PalmerTech wrote: 3dpmaster wrote: PalmerTech wrote: The curve greatly magnifies the image, that is why it does not need traditional lenses. A projection surface only works with a collimated light source, such as a projection, and then you still need something to modify the focal length. The Focal length is the most difficult part  Yes, I know. I was responding to Okta's idea of projecting the microdisplay's image onto a flat white curved surface instead of a mirror, and that it would not work unless you added another lens anyway.  I just checked the pictures again  I see how it works now, i would be looking into a mirror with the image set at the correct focal length. 3dpmaster: when you say focal length is the biggest problem, do you mean the interfaces on areas of all the reflectors matching up or over all?
_________________ Samsung 3d lcd led UA406000, Sharp XR-10X, 7800gt, HD6870, Samsung 450 series 50" 3d plasma, q6600, XP, Tecra m2 6600go laptop, Toshiba 7600 laptop, Xforce shutters, Argo HMD. VR920. Home brew high FOV 2d HMD. Wiimotiongun glovpepie controller, gryation air mice.
|
| Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:47 pm |
|
 |
|
3dpmaster
Two Eyed Hopeful
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:05 pm Posts: 61
|
The Issue is the focal plane. Some beams from the observer's eye (set to infinity) have a larger focal length than other beams also set to infinity. With the technique of Mr. Hajime N., most of the rays are inverted to +/- infinity before they reach the collimated lens. The idea to set two micro projectors on the top of the head to project the image to a curved screen is not bad. If we use a pair of reading eye glasses, we can bring the curved screen closer to the observer's eye. The best screen to use, is a toroidal curved screen. The projector lens has to be FISHEYE to get a wide projection at short distance. I have to try this technique, I hope It will works also. 
_________________ Full immersive research:
HMD: SONY HMZ-T1 FOV: 40° diagonal
HMD project: FOV: >180°
|
| Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:24 pm |
|
 |
|
3dpmaster
Two Eyed Hopeful
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:05 pm Posts: 61
|
Correction, the focal POINTS are not on a planar surface. Image below.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
_________________ Full immersive research:
HMD: SONY HMZ-T1 FOV: 40° diagonal
HMD project: FOV: >180°
|
| Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:07 pm |
|
 |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|