Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Oculus?

Post Reply
GSG9LIGHTNING
One Eyed Hopeful
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:45 pm

Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Oculus?

Post by GSG9LIGHTNING »

Key Features

Degrees of Freedom 3 (Yaw, Pitch, and Roll)
Angular Range Full 360° - All Axes
Maximum Angular Rate* 2000° per second
Minimum Angular Rate* 0° per second
Accuracy (RMS)* 1° in yaw, 0.25° in pitch & roll at 25°C
Angular Resolution* 0.01° RMS
Update Rate 200 Hz
Minimum Latency 2 ms for RS-232 (PC host OS dependent)
Prediction Up to 50 milliseconds
Serial Rate 115.2 kbaud
Size 1.44 in. x 1.09 in. x 0.55 in.
(36.6 mm x 27.7 mm x 13.8 mm)
Weight 0.39 ounces (11 grams)

Cable Length
15 ft. (4.572 m) for RS-232 Version
6 ft. (2.0 m) for USB Version
Power 6 VDC, 40 mA via AC adapter
Operating Temp. Range 0° to 50° C

O/S Compatibility .dll for Windows 7/XP. so for Linux.dylib for Mac OS X
Compliance CE, UL, RoHS

(copied and pasted from the website of intersense )



2 ms latency seems to be pretty perfect for a full immersion effect without nausea/sickness
I know the Price is a little bit high with 995$ , but with a high number of orders it might be cheaper in production

http://www.intersense.com/pages/18/234/
User avatar
brantlew
Petrif-Eyed
Posts: 2221
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:23 pm
Location: Menlo Park, CA

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by brantlew »

Their internally developed tracker should have similar or better specs and fits better and cheaper into their system. Hopefully they will follow through with their plans to release an independent version of their tracker just like this.
User avatar
Chriky
Binocular Vision CONFIRMED!
Posts: 228
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:24 am

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by Chriky »

It doesn't look any better than npr's to be honest, and its an order of magnitude more expensive.
sergehag
One Eyed Hopeful
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 5:54 pm

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by sergehag »

Oculus tracker <1 ms latency
User avatar
cybereality
3D Angel Eyes (Moderator)
Posts: 11407
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:18 pm

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by cybereality »

$1K??!?!?! Thanks, but no thanks.
PalmerTech
Golden Eyed Wiseman! (or woman!)
Posts: 1644
Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 9:06 pm

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by PalmerTech »

GSG9LIGHTNING wrote:I know the Price is a little bit high with 995$ , but with a high number of orders it might be cheaper in production
It costs them nowhere near $1000 to make that thing, production cost is not the issue. They are not targeting mass market, just military/research/industrial/professional applications.
Krenzo
Binocular Vision CONFIRMED!
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:46 pm

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by Krenzo »

IMU trackers cost about $10 in parts. That's quite a markup.
User avatar
benz145
Two Eyed Hopeful
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 5:20 pm

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by benz145 »

Palmer, do you think the Oculus tracker will be disruptive in those military/research/industrial industries because of it's performance and price (you are still planning on offering if to developers, right)?
User avatar
Namielus
Certif-Eyable!
Posts: 957
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:49 am
Location: Norway
Contact:

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by Namielus »

I have never known the military to remotely care about getting anything cheaper. Hahahahah

"Hey, I will light fire to this pile of money and pay you with the fumes"
Riftoholic

My precious 6 month project the Oculus Virtual Lounge:
Image
If you help me in any way I will be forever grateful.
User avatar
Dakor
Binocular Vision CONFIRMED!
Posts: 213
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:58 am
Location: Dortmund, Germany
Contact:

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by Dakor »

In the Industry or Military its not very important if its cheap the point is how it works.
You got to see this like:
If you can save/earn A LOT OF money it's not important for you spend 300Dollars for a <1ms latency device or 300.000Dollars for device with < 0.5ms latency (just an example)<
I don't think the (not gaming) industry will be that much interested in Oculus that much since they got all the technology and accuracy a long time ago..
German blogger, enthusiast and developer.
Image
EdZ
Sharp Eyed Eagle!
Posts: 425
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:38 am

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by EdZ »

It's more support and robustness that you pay for. If the military buys something, they expect to be able to leave it in a crate for a few years, throw it onto a plane to be flung about a bit, then dumped somewhere in the bowels of a ship for a few months, maybe bake it in a desert for another few months, and only then actually take it out and use it, and expect it to work properly first time.

In the consumer world, you can just buy another one. In the military world, you need it to work. Now. This one right here.
2EyeGuy
Certif-Eyable!
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:32 pm

Re: Might this be a candidate Headtracking unit for the Ocul

Post by 2EyeGuy »

The Rift's simplicity would be an advantage with that. The Rift will probably be more reliable than other headsets. And a military would presumably have all the source code for their software, so they could get someone to port their software to support the Rift. Unless they need high resolution for something, I think the Rift would be useful to them. I'd use Rifts if I had a military.

Which is unfortunate, because I don't want militaries to use the Rift. Especially since in any given war, at least half the militaries are the bad guys. I'm in Pforzheim at the moment which was bombed extremely heavily during WW2 (it was a very old beautiful city dating back to the Romans). Before that, I was in Liverpool, which was also bombed extremely heavily during WW2. That's not why I was in either place, just a coincidence of where my family were staying.
Post Reply

Return to “Oculus VR”