Search

MTBS3D .@34bigthings developer of the sci-fi racing game REDOUT joins the @official_ita3d! #Redout #VR #VirtualRealityhttps://t.co/f31jVSkLWO
MTBS3D It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia goes #VR 360 tonight! @alwayssunny #SunnyFXX #VirtualRealityhttps://t.co/gk9mJcVoxo
MTBS3D On this week's show #Zenimax vs #Oculus verdict, and an interview with Tero Sarkkinen, Founder of @BasemarkLtd! #VRhttps://t.co/kbQHe39HI4
MTBS3D Judgement Served With a $500 Million Bill For Oculus. #Oculus #Facebook #ZeniMax #VR https://t.co/gKRTZ77K0a https://t.co/Dri0lGKysG
MTBS3D Bertrand Nepveu of @Vrvana talked with us about their latest HMD upgrades at @CES. #CES2017 #VR #AR #MixedRealityhttps://t.co/R6HEQL6Uw3
MTBS3D .@panasonic discussed their new 220 degree FOV VR HMD with us at @CES. #CES2017 #Panasonic #VR #VirtualRealityhttps://t.co/0PW67eaKIp
MTBS3D .@NGCodec is working on a cloud-based #VR platform. They showed us the potential at @CES. @OlyG #CES2017https://t.co/odlHIRIDZm
MTBS3D We interviewed @SamsungCanada's Chief Marketing Officer at @CES. #CES2017 #GearVR #Oculus #VR #VirtualRealityhttps://t.co/F2HKIiFw1L
MTBS3D We spoke w/@ImmerVision at @CES. They make 360 panamorph lenses for several leading 360 camera systems. #CES2017https://t.co/1hyfeHziTK
MTBS3D We spoke w/@ImmerVision at @CES. They make 360 panamorph lenses for several leading 360 camera systems. #CES2017https://t.co/age4LhRIvp
MTBS3D We spoke to Mark Childs, Chief Marketing Officer for @SamsungCanada at @CES. #CES2017 #GearVR #Oculus #VRhttps://t.co/wsb07lv6OP
MTBS3D We spoke to @kwikvr_sgx about their new tetherless #VR enabling prototype at @CES. #CES2017 #VirtualRealityhttps://t.co/4E6FjFtngQ
MTBS3D We interviewed @GoTouchVR at @CES about their new haptics device prototype for #VirtualReality devices. #CES2017https://t.co/gDHX3dVi48
MTBS3D RT @Robertsmania: Still freaks me out to see myself on videos... Do I really sound like that?!? #VR #SimRacing @MTBS3D #CES2017 https://t.…
MTBS3D We spoke with @htc at @CES about their new audio add-on for the @htcvive, Vive Port, #VR arcades & more! #CES2017https://t.co/dT7nfuGrAw
MTBS3D We spoke to @FibrumVR at @CES about their HMDs for mobile phones and growing ecosystem of games! #CES2017 #VRhttps://t.co/BShIoaqHZi
MTBS3D .@AMD spoke with us at @CES about the long awaited Vega GPU architecture coming up around the bend! #CES2017 #AMDhttps://t.co/pRCSkHHSfj

U-Decide 2010 Preliminary Results, Part 2

By Neil Schneider

Yesterday, we presented a few charts from the preliminary findings from 2010's edition of The U-Decide Initiative.  As a reminder, here are some of its key features:
  • Data collected from July 7th to October 1st, 2010
  • Jointly partnered and promoted with Panasonic, Electronic Arts, Ubisoft, Steelseries, Zalman, Blitz Games Studios, Computer Power User, and Meant to be Seen.
  • Purposely targeted to gamers (console & PC)
  • 1,169 respondents (735 traditional 2D gamers that don't own 3D equipment, 434 experienced stereoscopic 3D gamers that do)
  • These preliminary results are 100% based on the 2D gamer portion to avoid skewing.
  • This is a tiny sampling of the data collected.  A full report will be released in November, 2010.
  • 75% of respondents are based in North America, 15% are from Europe, and the remaining 10% span the world.
  • According to the Entertainment Software Association, over 50% of adults play video games.
The work continues!

Is There Money to be Made For Game Developers?

One of the leading issues for stereoscopic 3D game developers is whether or not there is money to be made from having a special 3D mode, and whether or not gamers would be willing to spend a premium on this mode.

3D Premium for 3D PC Games (2D Gamer Sample)

According to traditional 2D gamers, there is a clear willingness to spend a bit more for 3D compatibility (if they owned a 3D display).  Approximately 40% of respondents are willing to spend anywhere from $3 to $5 more on a $50 game title on PC.  Another 12% is ok with playing as much as $10 more.  Over 15% suggest premiums as high as 50% to 100% more for their video games.  We are unconvinced that premiums this high would sell very well with gamers, but it's a good indicator that 3D compatibility has measurable value associated with it.

3D Premium for 3D Console Games (2D Gamer Sample)

Willingness to pay a premium for 3D compatibility is a bit less for console gamers versus PC gamers, but not by much.  Just under 40% are comfortable with the $3 to $5 range, and almost 12% will go as high as $10.  As with PC, we aren't big believers in the $25 to $50 premium range for console 3D games, but almost 14% of 2D gamers suggest this as a possibility.

Up until now, 3D gaming has been treated as a free feature on PC and console video games.  Do you think this trend will change?  Why or why not?  Do you see this as a feasible way for game developers to make some extra money out of stereoscopic 3D gaming?  What criteria would game developers need to meet for a premium like this to be feasible?